Hopes fading for dual citizenship referendum in Lithuania – LWC leader
Hopes are fading for a positive dual citizenship referendum in Lithuania after President Dalia Grybauskaitė vetoed amendments to the Referendum Law, lowering the threshold for such a referendum, the head of the Lithuanian World Community says.
"It's such a pity. We had so much hope to have at least some possibility to have a positive referendum outcome. And now this hope is fading as 1.3 million votes will be needed," Dalia Henke told BNS Lithuania on Wednesday, commenting on the presidential veto.
"We, nevertheless, are glad that the president of the Republic of Lithuania supports the referendum and agrees that we need to resolve this issue, and that we all – the president, the Seimas speaker, the prime minister – should be united and get the nation together to resolve this issue. I hope that unity will prevail," she said.
Henke underlined that for a referendum on dual citizenship to succeed and for the institute of dual citizenship to be expanded, citizens living in Lithuania need to, first of all, be very active and vote in such a referendum.
"The decision will not be made with the votes of those living abroad as only 300,000 Lithuanian living abroad have the right to vote, but it will be made in Lithuania as 1.3 million votes will be needed. (…) So it’s in Lithuania where we need to step up all effort and launch a public campaign on the importance of preserving citizenship, and to stress that we are a wide, big nation with diasporas across the world and that every citizen counts," Henke said.
The Lithuanian president earlier vetoed the amendments the Referendum Law as potentially running counter to the country's Constitution.
The president underlined that she's in favor of granting dual citizenship to a larger number of people but invited Lithuanians across the world to get together for legalizing such a possibility in a way that does not raise constitutional doubts.
In late June, the Seimas of Lithuania adopted the amendments to Article 7 of the Referendum Law, thus lowering the threshold for the referendum on amending Article 12 of the Constitution, which is connected to citizenship.
According to the current provisions of Article 7(3) of the Referendum Law, more than half of the citizens having the right to vote and having been registered on electoral rolls would have to approve the amendments to Article 12 of the Constitution to deem them adopted. The amendments to Article 7(3) of the Referendum Law would determine that the decision to amend Article 12 of the Constitution would be deemed adopted if it was approved by more than half of the turnout in the referendum but not less than one-third of the citizens having the right to vote and having been registered on electoral rolls.
The president believes the parliament's proposal to specifically lower the threshold for a citizenship referendum from 1.25 million to 840,000 votes raises constitutional doubts and thus is very risky.
The results of a referendum held based on the amended law are likely to be later quashed in court and deemed void and null. In that case the expansion of dual citizenship would be postponed indefinitely, the presidential office said in a statement.
The adopted amendments have been criticized by parliamentary lawyers and some lawmakers who say they will create a dangerous precedent and facilitate changes to other constitutional articles.
As a precaution, the Seimas plans to turn to the Constitutional Court in the fall regarding the constitutionality of the adopted amendments.
Lithuanians living all over the world had asked to adopt the amendments on the legalization of dual citizenship, fearing that, otherwise, a referendum on dual citizenship would fail.
Under a plan, such a referendum could be held alongside presidential elections next year.
Currently, people who left Lithuania after it regained independence in 1990 cannot hold dual citizenship, apart from a few exceptions. That provision can only be amended by referendum.
The Constitutional Court has ruled that dual citizenship cannot be a common phenomenon and granting it to people who left Lithuania after it restored independence would run counter to the Constitution.